We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Dear Ms. Griego,
Please find attached DoorDash, Inc.’s comments in response to the ABCD’s proposed rules affecting alcohol delivery.
Best regards,
Alex
Alex Mooney
Legislative Policy Advisor
DoorDash.com
202-321-8186
Alex Mooney DoorDash_NM Comment Letter – Google Docs
Downtown Liquor & Foodmart
1900 4t St NW, Albuquerque, NM 87102
07/23/2021
To Whom It may Concern:
I oppose the new rule that ABC is trying to allow bars at restaurants with A & B licenses. The food to alcohol ratio is not enough to differentiate between licenses. With this new rule restaurants won’t be food establishments anymore but drinking establishments.
Restaurants are in business to serve food and not to serve spirits. It will devaluate liquor licenses that currently liquor stores own or lease to run their business. It likely will hurt business like ours that only rely on sale of alcohol to stay in business.
I request ABC not to approve bars at restaurants with A & B licenses.
Thanks,
Rajiv P Shah
Downtown Liquor & Foodmart
505-307-3409
Rajiv Shah downtown liquor & foodmart
Good afternoon Desirae:
I’ve attached some of my comments regarding the recent changes to the Liquor Control Act.
Sincerely,
Mark M. Rhodes
Rhodes & Salmon, P.C.
1801 Lomas Blvd NW
Albuquerque, NM 87104
P: (505) 247-0328
F: (505) 766-9402
Email: mmr@rspcnm.com
Mark M. Rhodes HB255 Thoughts for Rule Making Session
Dear Desirae,
Attached please find comments on Proposed Rulemaking submitted on behalf of our client, Maplebear, Inc. dba Instacart. We appreciate the Division’s consideration. Thank you.
Laura R. Welch | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Paralegal/Legal Secretary
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 | Sacramento, CA 95814-4741
t +1.916.329.4721
laura.welch@pillsburylaw.com | pillsburylaw.com
Laura R. Welch 20210723 – Instacart’s Comments to Proposed Rulemaking re Alcohol Delivery 4829-1062-8851 v.1
Dear Desirae,
Please find attached ADSA’s comment regarding Liquor Control Act Proposed Rules: 15.10.51.15 Sales of Certain Spiritous Liquors.
Please contact us directly if you have any questions.
-Matt
Matt Dogali | President + CEO
matt@americandistilledspirits.org | 202-999-9776
American Distilled Spirits Alliance
http://www.americandistilledspirits.org
Matt Dogali ADSA NM 50 ml Proposed Rules Comments July 2021 Letterhead
Dear ABC Committee,
I have the following suggestions/comments/questions for the HB255 rulemaking committee:
1) What safeguards will be put in place to prevent a restaurant licensee from acting like and becoming a bar?
2) Are 3oz or less liquor containers able to be packed into multiple packs allowing them to be sold in a more than one scenario?
3) If a restaurant is able to act as a bar, can a package store designate a “bar” on their premises based on the new definition of a premises?
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks you,
Kerry Lee
Dear ABC Division:
As the rulemaking process for HB255 is underway, I would like to know the following:
1) What is the definition of a licensed premise under this rule?
2) Under this rule, will a restaurant be allowed to add a bar area under the new definition of licensed premise?
3) Can a package liquor store designate an area as a bar under the licensed premise new definition?
4) Can packs of miniatures be sold as they are more than 3 ounces?
Cynthia L. Sanchez, Ed. D
GCT LLC
Chief Operation Officer
cyndisanchez512@gmail.com
505-920-2811
Please see attached.
Distiller’s Guild Letter to ABC
Good evening,
Please find the attached comments pertaining to the proposed rules for HB255. If I can be of any assistance please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you for your efforts.
John L. Thompson Comments for Proposed Rules for HB255 (002)
I am unable to attend the liquor license rulemaking hearing scheduled for 7/26/2021, but would like to comment. It is my opinion that bars should not be allowed in restaurants with A or B licenses. The food to alcohol ratio is not enough to differentiate between licenses, and the new rules should not allow restaurants to become drinking establishments. The primary function of a restaurant is the sale of food yet many operate as drinking establishment. Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely
Lillian Grady
Liquor License 2677 Yesterday’s Enterprises
Bars should not be allowed in restaurants with A or B licenses. The food-to-alcohol ratio is not enough to differentiate between licenses, and the new rules should not allow restaurants to become drinking establishments.
Subject: Proposed Rules for new alcohol legislation
Good Morning,
On the behalf of our company, Little Toad Creek Brewery & Distillery, I am writing to express my concerns about the new proposed alcohol rules and how they will affect our business. During the past year with all the restrictions on our business we have pivoted to focus on distribution of our craft beer and spirits products. This is now a key component of our success. There are proposed rules which will inhibit our distribution sales capabilities within the state of New Mexico.
I am particularly concerned about the elimination of the Craft Distiller’s access to sales of craft canned RTD (ready-to-drink) cocktails through restaurant delivery.
The final version of House Bill 255 that passed this year says:
Section 4 B. An alcoholic beverage delivery permit issued to a valid restaurant licensee shall only convey the authority to deliver alcoholic beverages concurrently with the delivery of a minimum of ten dollars ($10.00) worth of food; provided that under no circumstances shall the delivery of alcoholic beverages be more than seven hundred fifty milliliters of wine, six twelve-ounce containers of prepackaged wine, beer, cider or spirituous liquors or one locally produced growler…
This language would allow for delivery of canned cocktails from a restaurant premise with the correct licenses.
In contrast, the proposed rules say:
15.11.20.10 DELIVERY RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR RESTAURANT LICENSES: A. Restaurant licenses are limited to the delivery of alcoholic beverage types allowed by their license.B.Alcoholic beverages shall only be delivered to customers concurrently with the delivery of a minimum of ten dollars ($10.00) worth of food.C.Delivery of alcoholic beverages to one location, during a three hour period of time, shall not exceed:(1) seven hundred fifty milliliters of wine; (2) six twelve-ounce containers of prepackaged wine, beer, cider;(3)one growler of product manufactured by a small brewer; or(4)one howler of a cocktail containing no more than four and one-half ounces of spiritous liquors, in order to comply with Section 60-6A-4(F)(6), NMSA 1978, of the act. The howlers used must contain the DBA of the licensee etched onto the glass or have the receipt secured onto the container. D. Contracting with the holder of a third-party delivery license shall not be used as a means to circumvent
Comparing the highlighted texts – the proposed rules leave out 12-ounce containers of spirits, which is a distinct disadvantage to Craft Distillers.
Canned cocktails are an important emerging market. We have invested a considerable amount of time and money in developing our canned cocktails and believe they would be a great fit for restaurants to sell for delivery with food orders. Many restaurants are seeking a simple solution to adding spirits to their menus, and the ready-to-drink cocktails fit that need. This will be a good market for our distillery and other NM Craft Distillers. Our canned cocktails range in ABV from 10% to 12.9%, which is no higher than the average ABV of wine. We strongly believe that these should be added back into the language in the rules in order to be in alignment with the passed legislation and to provide craft distillers with equal opportunity as compared to craft producers of beer, cider, and wine. If there needs to be a limit on the ABV we recommend 13% ABV max RTD cocktails in 12 ounce containers in 4-packs (most RTD cocktails are packaged in 4-packs). This would be in alignment with alcohol content of other allowed packed products for delivery.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Teresa Dahl-Bredine
Little Toad Creek Brewery & Distillery
203 S Mill Road
Silver City, NM 88061
575-654-7357
Teresa Dahl-Bredine
Little Toad Creek Brewery & Distillery
575-654-7357
Public comment is attached
Twisted Shotz 100ml small size Packaging Aproval July 21
I have a concern about proposed changes to 15.10.32.10(D, E) and 15.10.32.14(B) :
During the pandemic, ABC issued us a temporary license to expand our premises into the gravel parking lot behind our building. The parking lot is separated from the brewery’s indoor licensed premises by a city alleyway. We obtained permission from the city to make use of the alleyway as part of our application for the temporary license, and it was approved by ABC. We are planning on making the temporary beer garden permanent by submitting an amended floorplan application, but the proposed rules appear to prohibit our previously approved configuration. Adding “unless an exception to this rule is approved in writing by the Director” might solve this issue for us. Please advise.
Dear Desirae. As of July 1 for sales and packages are ridiculous !! We have enough problems.
The 7 am time is crazy. They should just leave it at 10am. This is going to cause higher DWI
Lot more accidents to happen Thank you
Hello, I am emailing you in regards to one of the new liquor laws that has recently gone into
effect. I am gravelly concerned with the law which allows establishments to begin serving
alcohol at, in my opinion, too early in the day. After learning that establishments can now
serve alcohol to their patrons as early as 7:00 a.m. I strongly believe this to be a big mistake.
With New Mexico already having one of the highest driving while intoxicated, as well as
fatalities due to drunk drivers per capita in the U.S.A. the aforementioned law will
significantly increase these awful incidents. I strongly oppose the sale of alcohol before
12:00p.m. except in cases where the establishment only serves it’s patron(s) alcohol if food is
served with the alcohol after 11:00 a.m. Thank you for your time and consideration. Feel free
to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
public comment attached
Jacqueline Flug
I object to the requirement in the new proposed regulations that outdoor areas be attached to a licensed building. Outdoor areas can be controlled adequately whether attached by a fence or corridor or freestanding. The regulations specifically state that buildings operated under one liquor license do not need to be connected by indoor passageways. This should be extended to outdoor areas.
Your references to Restaurant (a) (A) and (b) (B) licenses are significantly different in the rule than in the statute. This may cause confusion.
I am all for the delivery of liquor to homes. I think the delivery of alcohol to homes would probably cause a reduction in drunk driving incidents. I agree that the liquor shouldn’t be delivered to public locations such as businesses, campuses, and parks. Alcohol should only be delivered when an individual is shown to have access to a house. No delivery to someone standing in front of a house.
I would appreciate a slight increase in the allowable alcohol content of a howler to 6 Fl Oz. I think the 3 hour time frame is reasonable.
All other changes I am all about, increased competition without an enormous buy in would be great for both New Mexicans and New Mexican businesses. I appreciate our state legislators being able to come together and make changes where they were desperately needed.